 |
Duration: 03:10 minutes Upload Time: 2007-09-11 06:33:29 User: LiberalViewer :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day |
|
Tags:
Fox News Ann Coulter Neil Cavuto Iraq surge U.S. Congress hearings David Petraeus Ryan Crocker liberal treason
Description: Instead of giving its viewers full coverage of the September 10 congressional questioning of General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker on the status of Iraq, Fox News broke away from the hearings when Democrats were doing the questioning multiple times, most egregiously to cover the Ann Coulter clips I compiled for my viewers in this video. This video is one of DOZENS of examples now listed on my Fox News Bias playlist at: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=A3BD2524FE99BD4D |
|
Comments | |
| abates17 ::: Favorites 2008-01-15 15:06:12 "Again, putting quotes around 'nice' doesnt mean I was quoting Cavuto" When you are referring to something he said, and using quotation marks, then yes, that is absolutely what it means. __________________________________________________ | |
| abates17 ::: Favorites 2008-01-15 15:02:51 "Youve evaded my argument for months, so why not finally address it?" I have addressed your argument, and you have ignored or dodged my responses. I see no indication that this will change any time soon. Your refusal to define "bias" through comparison or example shows just how baseless your argument is. __________________________________________________ | |
| LiberalViewer ::: Favorites 2008-01-15 11:59:31 abates, abates, Again, putting quotes around "nice" doesnt mean I was quoting Cavuto, nor does using the root word mean I "completely change the meaning" or "imply things that are false." If u can provide evidence that I "imply things that are false" I will respond to that evidence as time permits. But, shouldn't u 1st provide evidence I misused the word "multiply" given that u claimed I misused that word months ago w/no evidence? Thx 4 comments :-) __________________________________________________ | |
| LiberalViewer ::: Favorites 2008-01-15 11:57:57 abates, Sorry, but I have read everything u posted and nothing u posted actually addresses my argument that the clips show bias b/c Fox REPLACED what the Democrats were actually saying during a live news event w/Coulter's parody of punditry attacking Democrats, easily qualifying this video as another of the many examples of bias on my Fox News Bias playlist at tinyurl(.)com/yq6vuf Youve evaded my argument for months, so why not finally address it? Thx 4 comment :-) __________________________________________________ | |
| abates17 ::: Favorites 2008-01-14 20:31:40 "If my claim is 'unsupported' than why have u never actually addressed by argument..." I have addressed it, and you simply respond by parroting the same statement over and over again. Your style of argument is equivalent to saying "No it's not" to every statement I make. That's not an argument; that is mindless denial. __________________________________________________ | |
| abates17 ::: Favorites 2008-01-14 20:29:41 "Putting quotes around the word 'X' when discussing the word 'X' is also acceptable usage." Yes, if you are not discussing what a particular person said. But when you are talking about what someone said, then the quotes imply that you are quoting that person. "And, again, using the root word to discuss a word in a clip I showed does not create a 'completely different meaning.'" It does, if you do not indicate that you are talking about the root word. __________________________________________________ | |
| LiberalViewer ::: Favorites 2008-01-14 18:48:58 abates, If my claim is "unsupported" than why have u never actually addressed by argument that the clips show bias b/c Fox REPLACED what the Democrats were actually saying during a live news event w/Coulter's parody of punditry attacking Democrats, easily qualifying this video as another of the many examples of bias on my Fox News Bias playlist at tinyurl(.)com/yq6vuf? Thx 4 comment :-) __________________________________________________ | |
| LiberalViewer ::: Favorites 2008-01-14 18:48:42 abates, Putting quotes around the word "X" when discussing the word "X" is also acceptable usage. I'm glad I could teach u that! Sorry if u misunderstood :-( And, again, using the root word to discuss a word in a clip I showed does not create a "completely different meaning." Sorry if that confused you :-( Thx 4 comments :-) __________________________________________________ | |
| abates17 ::: Favorites 2008-01-13 23:13:26 "...about whether Fox was biased..." Cut and paste again. Let me know when you stop reiterating the same tired, unsupported claim. __________________________________________________ | |
| abates17 ::: Favorites 2008-01-13 23:12:35 "Putting quotes around 'nice' doesnt mean I was quoting Cavuto" That's exactly why they are called "quotation marks": because they denote a quotation. When you talk about what Cavuto said, then put quotes around a word, then it is implied that you are quoting him. "nor does using the root word mean I 'completely change the meaning'" You said that Cavuto called Ann's statements as "nice," which is a completely different meaning that "nicely," the word he used. __________________________________________________ | |
| pr0t0color ::: Favorites 2008-01-13 03:50:16 What does it say about FOX that they rely upon the analysis provided by Mr. Coulter? If that is who they choose to represent their perspective. . .well. . .FOX must be real short on capable analysts! __________________________________________________ | |
| LiberalViewer ::: Favorites 2008-01-12 13:20:25 abates, Putting quotes around "nice" doesnt mean I was quoting Cavuto, nor does using the root word mean I "completely change the meaning" or "imply things that are false." If u can provide evidence that I "imply things that are false" I will respond to that evidence as time permits. But, shouldn't u 1st provide evidence I misused the word "multiply" given that u claimed I misused that word months ago w/no evidence? Thx 4 comments :-) __________________________________________________ | |
| LiberalViewer ::: Favorites 2008-01-12 13:14:32 abates, The lack of requirement that Fox be unbiased does not save u in an argument about whether Fox was biased b/c Fox REPLACED what the Democrats were actually saying during a live news event w/Coulter's parody of punditry attacking Democrats, easily qualifying this video as another of the many examples of bias on my Fox News Bias playlist at tinyurl(.)com/yq6vuf Thx 4 comment :-) __________________________________________________ | |
| larma7 ::: Favorites 2008-01-12 10:54:39 Fox is already a disgrace for continuing to bring on Ann Coulter, nevermind bringing her on to discuss serious issues. That rant was not a commentary or anything like that, but rather a hate speech on the so-called "liberal media". Even though Coulter's own fabricated journalism is based on the principles of bashing Democrats and liberal views. __________________________________________________ | |
| larma7 ::: Favorites 2008-01-12 10:48:10 Alright, lets get this out of the way. Everyone has come to expect these hate rants from Coulter because anyone who is intelligent knows that she is not in the vicinity of being a journalist, but Christ almoghty, the other guy is one of there lead anchors(I presume) and he did not even question Coulter's rant claiming the Democrats are "treasonous and rapists"? That anchor is an abomination to Journalism and Coulter is just an abomination of a human. __________________________________________________ | |
No comments:
Post a Comment